After all the bitter recriminations that have been fired at Donald Trump (and fallen far short of the mark), it puzzles me that no one has written an expose on the conspicuously criminal network of Hunter Biden associates. They are legion, so let’s take a look.
But first let’s consider the evidence from Hunter Biden’s own writing that he deliberately chose not to register as a foreign agent, as he was legally required to do. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/10/25/how-hunter-biden-attempted-to-avoid-registering-as-a-foreign-agent-n2578746 Paul Manifort was prosecuted for violation of this very same law. https://www.wiley.law/alert-FARA_Alert-Lobbyist_Pleads_Guilty_to_Failing_to_Register_as_a_Foreign_Agent_for_Ukraine Like Hunter Biden (and John Podesta), Manifort had unreported business in Ukraine. But unlike Manifort, Biden and Podesta were never prosecuted.
While we’re at it, I suppose we should also take a cursory look at the information released from last year’s Senate Finance Committee Report on Biden family activities in Ukraine, China etc. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf While I realize that garden variety Know Nothings and Trump haters on the left would not ordinarily put much stock in a report from the Republican controlled Senate, I thought even they might consider an exception in this case given that the report corresponds item for item with the information obtained from Hunter Biden’s emails and the documents and statements provided by his former partners. Hunter has also been named (but not charged) in a $43 million fraud scheme against the Oglala Sioux. https://www.stocklaw.com/securities-fraud-blog/2019/july/dunkerley-named-in-43-million-dollar-fraud-schem/ All of his former partners in that scheme have been convicted. Continue reading
American leaders from both parties stood down to China for 40 years. The Chinese Communist Party broke the rules on global trade, allowed Chinese firms to steal technology from American companies, and in turn destroyed entire sectors of our economy.
The corporate class and its chosen “experts,” for their part, turned a blind eye to China’s human rights abuses and crackdowns on speech. Washington politicians fell in line: Just open America’s markets to China, they said, and the CCP will change its ways and become a responsible global citizen as it grows richer and stronger.
They were wrong. Under President Trump, America is fighting back.
Earlier this year, as the Coronavirus spread from China throughout the world, President Trump acted quickly. He restricted travel from China and launched a White House Coronavirus Task Force in January. At the time, Democrat leaders and liberal pundits called President Trump’s strong response to the virus “xenophobic.”
The World Health Organization continued to stand by Beijing’s side. A little over 2 weeks before President Trump’s actions, the WHO irresponsibly parroted the CCP’s claim that the Coronavirus could not be transmitted between humans.
In reality, if China had acted on the virus just three weeks sooner than it did, up to 95% of global cases from COVID-19 could have been prevented, according to a study from the University of Southampton in England. Continue reading
Much of the focus of the Hunter Biden/Joe Biden family story, as it has been marginally covered, has been on the inappropriateness of the relationship between Hunter Biden and the Obama Administration. Rightly so–selling access to the administration to enrich and benefit the Biden family (and who knows who else) is huge news. Then there is the whole other thread of the illegality of drug-fueled underage sexual relations between Hunter Biden and others–very illegal and very concerning. But a thread that has emerged should have some prominence in reporting is the shocking discovery of treasonous selling out of American technology to China through sales approved of by the Obama administration. Technology created by Americans that have clear military applications was being shared with China via Hunter Biden’s advocacy of these Chinese firms. Why isn’t anyone reporting on this? Let’s pray that there would be subpoenas issued and more about this exposed.
Watch this recent interview by Maria Bartiromo on Fox News with author Peter Schweizer about how it all happened:
Bartiromo asked, “Let me ask you about [Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States] and the approval that a foreigner needs in order to do an acquisition in the United States. That’s one of the things that you’ve reported on that these Chinese companies needed, right? They wanted the influence of Joe Biden so that they could get approval to acquire companies. This is what Continue reading
We are proud to endorse candidates for their stand to protect parent’s rights. It is our first act exercising our political muscle, and it feels great!
The primary issue today with public schools is the shift of influence in our public school system away from parent involvement.
Parents, today care about curriculum. They care about state and district policies infringing on their rights to make decisions about and with their minor children. The government has infringed upon those rights and it’s time to re-establish, to restore our rights!
It’s time to re-establish parent’s rights in education!
What did you feel as you watched the debate? Certainly, I think we can all agree it wasn’t as contentious as the first debate with the two-minute muted mic rule. Immediately following the debate, it was announced that fifty million people have already cast their vote. That’s a huge concern and why I’m not a fan of early voting. Because as the old saying goes, knowledge is power, and the amount of knowledge and breaking news we have received about the Biden family and information from this last debate is a game changer that may well have changed the minds of some early voters.
Let’s fact-check candidate Biden, using his own words:
(Note: There are hyperlinks throughout this article supporting this fact-check, often using video footage of Biden contradicting his debate statements.)
1) Biden: said he never called Trump “xenophobic” regarding the travel ban, but that it was a different context.
FALSE: President Trump was one of the first, if not the first, to place a travel ban on China which took place on January 31. Of that ban, Biden criticized him and called him xenophobic. Although Biden now claims that was in a different context, it was completely in response to the travel ban.
2) Biden: “40 nations had already moved” to restrict travel from China “before the president moved.” “We started off awfully slow.”
FALSE: On January 30, WHO declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a public health emergency of international concern. They did not recommend any travel or trade restrictions against China or other affected regions at that time. However, President Trump, in an early and bold move, instituted a travel ban on China the next day. The president was mocked for his actions by Biden and the media.
3) Biden: “I’m not banning fracking! I never said it!”
FALSE: Not only did Biden say it, so did his running mate, Kamala Harris. And they have both said it a multitude of times while out campaigning.
4) Biden: “No one lost coverage with Obamacare.”
FALSE: Right here at Intercessors for America, one of the staff members shared, “Our perfectly good plan was deemed illegal because it didn’t have maternity coverage. We were forced into the Marketplace. Further, another employee had coverage through a spouse’s job with Microsoft. Once Obamacare was passed, Microsoft dumped their ‘Cadillac’ coverage for employees and the deductibles have steadily risen since then. They now offer what is basically catastrophic coverage, which is what I have with the Marketplace. As a result, neither of our families go to the doctor.” Continue reading
In social media and evening TV and radio news this year, about the most overused word this year is — “expert.” On 31 Dec 2019, “experts” in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) declared that a new respiratory illness, centered in the city of Wuhan, had been identified.
During the next few months, “experts” in the World Health Organization, together with those in the CCP, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the White House Coronavirus Task Force, and those opposing President Trump — all came out with their “expert” opinions on [a] degree of human-to-human transmissibility of the virus, [b] whether wearing masks, blocking travel between countries, isolating senior citizens, and isolating school children, would help prevent spread of the virus, and [c] whether business lockdowns are important, versus too damaging to the country’s economy.
Many “expert” physicians from multiple countries provided their opinions on [a] whether respirators and oxygen were beneficial to hospitalized patients, [b] how many feet apart was regarded as “safe social distancing,” [c] how long should people be quarantined after apparent exposure, and [d] whether remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, large doses of vitamin D and/or many other “therapies” were beneficial to unhospitalized patients versus hospitalized seriously ill patients. Continue reading
At 11:56 am on Thursday, October 15, Portland General Electric (PGE) pulled the plug on the Boardman Coal Plant, PGE’s largest power plant. Boardman had a nameplate capacity of 550 firm megawatts of power and was decommissioned 20 years prematurely.
While environmentalists celebrate the plant’s closure, utility executives are still trying to figure out how they will keep the lights on in our region.
That’s because the more coal plants our region removes from the grid, the more likely we are to experience future blackouts. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council is tasked with running models to determine whether there is enough electricity supply to meet demand in the future during a “worst case scenario.” The Council considers the supply adequate if the Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) is 5% or less. In late 2019, the Council found the LOLP by 2026 to be 26%. This means that more than one out of every four simulations run by the Council shows the region facing a shortage of electricity.
To put that percentage into perspective, the LOLP during the 2001 energy crisis was predicted by the Council to be 24%. During this crisis, the Pacific Northwest experienced a prolonged drought that resulted in the loss of 4,000 megawatts of hydropower compared to the average year. To balance the grid, Bonneville Power Administration took back electricity previously sold to the aluminum industry, effectively putting 5,000 aluminum employees out of work. Continue reading
In May of this year, political light-years ago, a syndicated piece by David Limbaugh was published on this website, “Trump Supporters: Fear Not Those Discouraging Polls.”
Light years, yes, and much has changed since May. But the fact remains that the polls could not be reliably trusted then, and cannot be trusted now. Many of them are intentionally designed to dishearten and dispirit voters who support the president. Their designers and the people who work for them are in the business of seeding the ground with hopelessness.
The idea that Joe Biden’s catatonic campaign could be eclipsing the invigorated Trump sweep across America seems patently counterintuitive. While Biden struggles to attract a clutch of die-hard Democrats into a gymnasium, Trump is pulling up in Air Force One to overflow crowds and rock-star excitement.
Crowds on the ground do not necessarily a winning ticket make, that’s true. But enthusiasm gaps cannot be dismissed.
Some leftist pundits have floated the notion that since Biden supporters are more likely to harbor realistic fears about COVID, they are astronomically less likely to turn out en masse. Even if that’s true, it registers as impolitic. It creates a contrast that doesn’t do the Biden campaign any favors: Biden’s base cowering in their homes, and walking dogs in parks with masks on, while Trump’s base refuses to allow an admittedly nasty but ultimately surmountable virus to stop the workings of the country, or forestall their willingness to brave a virus to show support.
It’s a pretty good metaphor for the whole election. More alarmingly, it’s a good metaphor for the respective fate awaiting the republic dependent upon which candidate prevails on November 3rd.
Fear not the polls? Mr. Limbaugh is, of course, correct. Here’s an excerpt: Continue reading
“Get ready for bed.” “I don’t want to.”
“Eat your vegetables.” “I don’t want to.”
“Brush your teeth.” “I don’t want to.”
“Come in from play and wash your hands.” “I don’t want to.”
“Put that candy back.” “I don’t want to.”
“Get dressed for church.” “I don’t want to.”
Every parent has been frustrated by these obstinate interactions with their children. Wouldn’t it be nice, we think, if we could rewire their little brains and change their “want-to.” When a person repents of their sin and invites Christ to come into their life, that’s what God does. The Holy Spirit enters the person’s life, bringing with Him a new set of “want to’s.”
This is what the writer of Hebrews meant when he quoted Jeremiah in order to explain the New Covenant that the Lord Jesus instituted. “‘This is the covenant I will make with them after that time,’ says the Lord. ‘I will put My laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds.’” (Hebrews 10:16) Instead of limiting God’s instructions to ink on a page, He’d write them deep inside our hearts, always to be with us and to change the way we respond to life’s situations. Continue reading
One of the most substantial issues of Election 2020 is the Left’s pledge to pack the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) if they win—a scheme neither Joe Biden nor Kamala Harris will disavow.
Most people don’t realize how seriously this could undermine our entire democratic republic.
In one fell swoop, they could undermine the United States, which President Lincoln labeled the “the last best hope of mankind.”
The founders gave us checks and balances in the government so that no one group would have too much power.
But we have already seen in the last half of the last century an abuse of power by one branch of government, the Supreme Court—until (for the most part) William Rehnquist became Chief Justice in 1986, thanks to Ronald Reagan. Rehnquist was able to at least slow the tyranny to some degree.
Beginning in the 1950s, the court of Earl Warren (appointed by Eisenhower) and the court of Warren Burger (appointed by Nixon), often trumped the will of the people in many significant cases.
- They outlawed school prayer and Bible-reading as devotions (which has had the effect of outlawing the Bible in the schools—thus, banning the very book that historically gave birth to schools in America).
- They removed the Ten Commandments from the schools and later were shocked when kids without any values violated the “Thou shalt not kill” command that they never were exposed to.
- The runaway Supreme Court unleashed pornography on society and ordered by judicial fiat abortion on demand. To this day, abortion is still a controversial issue because we the people did not make this ruling.
- Another whopping example of judicial tyranny (post-Burger Court) was the 2015 same-sex marriage ruling.